header-logo header-logo

26 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Diversity lacking on government panels

Government legal panels are overwhelmingly lacking when it comes to ethnic diversity, according to a new report from the Bar Council.

Despite the members of the Bar broadly reflecting the ethnic makeup of the population in England and Wales, members of government legal panels—by which 3,267 barristers are employed—are disproportionately White. This is evident across the board, but becomes particularly stark at the highest levels of seniority: only three out of 77 panel silks are from ethnic minority backgrounds, and there are no Black barristers or Asian women barristers, and very few Asian men, on any of the KC panels. While White women are well-represented on panels, the report found that they do not always get equal access to the highest quality work available.

The report’s findings are disappointing given the Bar Council’s recommendations following its 2021 Race at the Bar report, which suggested monitoring panel selection with the aim of encouraging more barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds. As a result of its latest findings, the Bar Council has asked the government to commit to monitoring panel selection, work allocation and income by protected characteristics, and to publish the results within the next 12 months.

Chair of the Bar, Mark Fenhalls KC, said: ‘The findings of this report act as a stark reminder that work still needs to be done to ensure equality of opportunity at the Bar. Government legal panels have a key role to play to ensure that career advancement is open to all. 

‘We have been working closely with stakeholders across the government panels identified in this report to address future monitoring and selection practices. We know from our work with the CPS that effective work is underway to address the disparity between men and women at senior levels, and we are keen to see this good practice on diversity spread across all government panels.’

Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll