header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012 / James Wilson
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Diva in dispute

James Wilson on a not-so-silent screen star’s day in court

 

The film The Artist has recently given us a superb portrayal of a watershed time in Hollywood history. Not to be outdone, the English law reports of the day contain another. 

Young starlet

In 1931 a young American actress achieved every aspiring thespian’s dream: a contract with a major Hollywood studio. She was not particularly well-known at the time, but soon gained critical and commercial acclaim, enabling her to renegotiate her contract on more favourable terms a few years later. 

Nevertheless, she became disillusioned with the standard of roles she was being asked to play, and eventually moved to London to escape the punitive (as she saw it) terms of the contract. The studio, Warner Bros, took exception, and applied for an injunction in the English courts to prevent her from committing any breach. The actress defended the case under her married name of Ruth Nelson, but by then was known to all by her stage name: Bette Davis.

Exclusive deal

Her contract was in the standard form under
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll