header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012 / James Wilson
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Diva in dispute

James Wilson on a not-so-silent screen star’s day in court

 

The film The Artist has recently given us a superb portrayal of a watershed time in Hollywood history. Not to be outdone, the English law reports of the day contain another. 

Young starlet

In 1931 a young American actress achieved every aspiring thespian’s dream: a contract with a major Hollywood studio. She was not particularly well-known at the time, but soon gained critical and commercial acclaim, enabling her to renegotiate her contract on more favourable terms a few years later. 

Nevertheless, she became disillusioned with the standard of roles she was being asked to play, and eventually moved to London to escape the punitive (as she saw it) terms of the contract. The studio, Warner Bros, took exception, and applied for an injunction in the English courts to prevent her from committing any breach. The actress defended the case under her married name of Ruth Nelson, but by then was known to all by her stage name: Bette Davis.

Exclusive deal

Her contract was in the standard form under
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll