header-logo header-logo

Dispelling the s 21 myths

07 March 2014 / Mathew McDermott
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
web_mcdermott

A recent Court of Appeal ruling provides important clarification on the validity of s 21 notices, as Mathew McDermott reports

Sometimes, albeit rarely, certain legal phrases and concepts filter their way down into the awareness of the general public. One that seems to have done so successfully is “the s 21 notice”—the notice, emanating from s 21 of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988), that you use when seeking possession of a dwelling that was let on an assured shorthold tenancy.

What “everyone” knows about these s 21 notices is that they involve giving the tenant two months’ notice in writing to leave the property before you take formal possession proceedings. A further well understood aspect of s 21 notices is that they come in two forms depending on whether or not the tenancy is in its fixed term or, this having expired, has entered a periodic term.

If you serve the notice during the fixed term the requirements are not as demanding: two months’ notice in writing. This is in s 21(1)(b). If you serve the notice after the fixed term

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll