header-logo header-logo

Data protection adequacy rating welcomed

01 July 2021
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have welcomed the European Commission’s decision that UK data protection standards are ‘adequate’―however, weakening standards could lead to immediate revocation
The decision means digital information can continue to flow between the UK and European Economic Area (EEA) without additional safeguards being introduced.

Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the European Commission determines whether third countries provide adequate protection for personal data. The Trade and Cooperation Agreement provided a bridging mechanism, which was due to end on 30 June 2021.

Kate Brimsted, partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, said: ‘This formal recognition of the adequacy of the UK’s data protection laws is a highly significant step. 

‘It will save EU businesses with UK-bound data flows―as well as their UK business partners―a considerable amount of red tape. The decision was not a forgone conclusion and objections and concerns were raised by the European Parliament during the process.’

However, she highlighted the fact the decision came with a built-in expiry date of four years.

‘As well as this, if the UK’s data policy innovations go too far for the European Commission’s liking, there is the ability to revoke the decision immediately,’ she said.

‘While this comes as a relief (if not a surprise), the UK will have to box clever when it comes to its post-Brexit liberalisation of laws, and its digital strategy-setting. The UK government’s TIGRR [Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform] report last month proposed replacing the GDPR with a “more proportionate framework”, something which sounds exactly the kind of move likely to endanger the UK’s adequacy decision, if taken up.’

Had the European Commission decision gone the other way, all those processing personal data would have been required to put in place appropriate safeguards or rely on exemptions in data protection law.

The Law Society, which has been urging members to hope for the best but prepare for the worst, welcomed the news but recommended members regularly review their contingency planning.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Though adopted, adequacy decisions are time-limited, subject to review and may even be challenged in the future especially if the UK diverges from EU regulation.’

Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll