header-logo header-logo

15 March 2024 / Dr Tanya Garrett
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Cognitive assessments: dangerously remote?

163732
Psychologist Dr Tanya Garrett explains the risks of exclusively remote cognitive functioning & capacity assessments
  • Warns of the risks of remotely performed cognitive functioning, capacity and other psychological assessments.
  • Advises that solicitors should not commission these on a remote basis, and should alert the court in the event of any assessment being carried out remotely.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, I continued to offer all assessments in person, using personal protective equipment and social distancing. I felt this was important because so much of a psychologist’s assessment is based on rapport-building to ensure accurate information is provided and to assist clients when sharing difficult and personal information, as well as observing non-verbal communication, all of which are difficult to do remotely. However, I know many psychologists started offering remote assessments, including cognitive functioning/capacity assessments, and that this is still going on. I would suggest this was never necessary and that doing it now is not only unnecessary, but likely inappropriate unless under certain circumstances, as well as potentially misleading.

I first became concerned when I saw cognitive functioning assessments that another psychologist had completed, which did

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll