header-logo header-logo

19 January 2022
Issue: 7963 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal barristers vote for direct action

Barristers will down tools if the government has not agreed by mid-February to raise legal aid fees by the end of March

Nearly 2,000 practitioners (about 80% of the Criminal Bar) responded last week to the Criminal Bar Association’s (CBA’s) seven-day poll on direct action. Their grievance is Ministry of Justice (MoJ) delays in responding to Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid.

In December, Sir Christopher’s review recommended at least £135m extra per year be added to the budget in order to keep the criminal justice system functioning effectively. This would increase funding for solicitors and barristers by 15% above present levels, amounting to an extra £35m in fees.

Sir Christopher said there was ‘no scope for further delay’ in increasing fee rates.

However, the Justice Secretary has said he will not publish a full response until the end of March, followed by a consultation that is unlikely to conclude until the end of June. 

The CBA survey found 96% agreed Sir Christopher’s recommended 15% minimum increase was insufficient to ensure the long-term viability of the Criminal Bar.

Some 96.5% were in favour of taking action including adopting a ‘no returns’ policy as a minimum if the government did not commit to a ‘substantial increase’ in pay rates. 94% favoured action unless the government published a full response to the review, with a timetable for implementation, by 14 February and completed the statutory consultation by the end of March.

CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC and vice-chair Kirsty Brimelow QC said: ‘We have waited too long. We will wait no longer. Solidarity at the Criminal Bar has never been stronger. There is no going back.’

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The 15% increase in criminal legal aid rates recommended in Sir Christopher’s report should be implemented immediately. 

‘If this does not happen, we fear that our members will leave the market at ever faster rates. Criminal defence solicitors have been waiting 25 years for an increase.’

According to MoJ figures, 1,080 firms held a criminal legal aid contract in September 2021 compared to 1,621 firms in September 2012.

Issue: 7963 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll