header-logo header-logo

07 August 2008 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Crime brief

Proceeds of crime

Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v Allad [2008] EWCA Crim 1741, [2008] All ER (D) 407 (Jul)

The defendant had monies on account totalling £5,000. A restraint order was made against their client’s assets and the question arose as to whether or not the defendant was entitled to the £5,000 on account of the fact that at the time the restraint order was made their fees were already in excess of that amount. It was held that the defendant was entitled to the monies.

If the monies had not been held on account of costs in client account the situation would have been different and the defendant would simply have become a creditor. It is a reminder to all solicitors to ensure monies are obtained on account, but that does raise problems for some firms who do not have a client account (common for criminal firms), those firms therefore do this type of work at great risk.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll