header-logo header-logo

Crime brief: 23 May 2025

219528
In two places at once? David Walbank KC considers requests for extradition & the double criminality rule
  • US indictment for insider dealing.
  • Conduct in UK.
  • Double criminality rule.

The Supreme Court has recently re-examined the double criminality rule in a judgment that is reckoned to have caused consternation within the US Department of Justice: El-Khouri v Government of the United States of America [2025] UKSC 3.

The facts of the case

Joseph El-Khouri was a dual United Kingdom/Lebanese national resident in the UK. He was suspected of insider dealing. The Financial Conduct Authority had conducted a criminal investigation, but decided there was insufficient evidence to charge. However, US prosecutors took a different view. A New York grand jury returned an indictment charging Mr El-Khouri with 17 offences, including securities fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy, and a request was made for his extradition to the US.

The facts alleged in the extradition request were that he had solicited ‘material non-public information’ in respect of ongoing negotiations for mergers and acquisitions involving a number of companies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll