header-logo header-logo

26 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Cybercrime , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Cybercriminals attack

Fraudsters are taking advantage of lower levels of security and IT challenges as people work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Law Society and Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned

The lockdown has prompted a surge in scams, cybercrimes and horrific pranks such as Zoom bombers who anonymously join calls then use the sharescreen facility to post disturbing content. The SRA has received specific reports about law firms being targeted, for example, criminals attempted to create a standing order for £4,000 a month from one firm’s client account.

Action Fraud has reported a spike in attacks on smaller businesses, flagging that criminals are sending through emails designed to look like official government coronavirus advice, while the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) reported a 400% increase in cyberattacks across all businesses in the country during the first two weeks of lockdown.

The Law Society this week launched a cybersecurity campaign to help solicitors protect clients. It includes revised guidance on preventing frauds and scams, advice on the safe delivery of legal services online, and how to effectively use legal technology during the crisis.

‘Cybercriminals and fraudsters are circling like vultures to exploit any and all vulnerabilities,’ said Simon Davis, Law Society president.

‘It is important we are equipped to protect against these threats. We will be advising on the safe delivery of legal services from home, including the use of video-conferencing platforms such as Zoom.

‘Protecting clients’ data will rightly be a priority for many firms. We have a dedicated in-house team who will be on-hand to provide bespoke support to members, field queries, and facilitate thought leadership.’

The SRA published information at the start of the month advising firms on key cybersecurity issues. See: www.sra.org.uk/sra/news/cyber-security-qa.

It has provided wider information for law firms during the lockdown at: www.sra.org.uk/sra/news/coronavirus-update.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Cybercrime is a priority risk for the legal sector and it’s not going away during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The NCSC is also running a Cyber Aware campaign to help keep workers and the public safe. See: www.ncsc.gov.uk/cyberaware.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Cybercrime , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll