header-logo header-logo

30 July 2015
Issue: 7663 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Coventry v Lawrence provokes mixed feelings

The much-anticipated Supreme Court case of Coventry v Lawrence provokes “mixed feelings”, according to litigation lawyer David Greene.

The Supreme Court held 5-2 that the conditional fee regime does not breach human rights, at [2015] UKSC 50.

Writing in NLJ this week, Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe and NLJ consultant editor, says: “On the one hand, as a claimant lawyer I welcomed the finding but on the other hand I felt disappointed that after all this time and angst the court said ‘no change’ notwithstanding that it was the Supreme Court that seemed to start this hare running. The judgment is fascinating reading but the whole process has been somewhat of a damp squib.” Greene adds that the court “reminded us that the major issue for the court when examining legislation is not whether it is fair in its application...The test initially in challenging legislation is whether it was a disproportionate way to achieving a legitimate aim.”

Issue: 7663 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll