header-logo header-logo

24 June 2011 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Courting change

Peter Causton muses over the future of the litigation landscape

Hard on the heels of the Jackson and Young reviews and proposed cuts to the ambit of legal aid, comes another consultation from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ): Solving Disputes in the County Courts: Creating a simpler, quicker and more proportionate system, the responses to which are due in by the end of the month. In addition, the white paper dealing with the implementation of the Jackson reforms was published this week and it is unclear how the changes proposed in the consultation will tie in with this, or how all these ambitious changes will be funded.

If implemented, the proposals outlined in the consultation are likely to be a “double-whammy” for litigators already dealing with the changes to litigation funding being pushed through, including irrecoverability of the conditional fees arrangements uplift, and after-the-event insurance premiums. It is very difficult at this stage to predict exactly what the litigation landscape will look like in five years time.

It is clear from the consultation that the government wants to rationalise the jurisdiction of the civil

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll