header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007 / Prof A Mcgee , P Hughes , Dr Friston , M Smith
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Costs law brief

Ordinary claims, Defamation claims, Group litigation, Public interest challenges

Costs capping

In Willis v Nicolson [2007] EWCA Civ 199, the Court of Appeal (assisted by the senior costs judge as assessor) dealt with an appeal in respect of an application for a costs cap in a personal injury claim.  The claimant was a motorcyclist who had suffered extremely serious injuries in a road traffic accident.  On a full liability basis, the value of the claim is likely to be at least £5 million; the total costs for the whole action were estimated by the claimant’s solicitors at £959,342.

Field J refused the defendant’s application for a costs cap, but in order to provide her with a measure of protection, he ordered that the claimant be held to his latest estimate.

The Court of Appeal (Buxton, Smith and Wilson LLJs) dismissed the appeal for the primary reasons that it was now too late to impose a costs cap and also because of the further costs that would be incurred by any capping process.

It was noted that there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll