header-logo header-logo

Costs Law Brief

07 February 2008 / Dr Mr Friston , Prof A Mcgee , P Hughes , M Smith
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

SUCCESS FEES,
DEFINITION OF BASE CHARGES,
DISPROPORTIONATE ACCRUAL OF COSTS

In an article for this column in March 2006 (see 156 NLJ 7214, pp 364–65) we addressed the issue of success fees on work done by costs draftsmen in cases funded on a conditional fee agreement (CFA). We considered the prospect  that such success fees may be recoverable but expressed the view that costs draftsmen would do well not to be too hasty to order their Ferraris as any success fee would be likely to be payable to the solicitor.

 

Crane v Canons Leisure Centre

Shortly after that, the judgment of Master Wright, sitting in

Wandsworth County Court
, on 1 March 2006, in Crane v Canons Leisure Centre was published. Master Wright’s judgment was that the work of costs draftsmen fell within the definition of “disbursementsin the collective conditional fee agreement (CCFA) before

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll