header-logo header-logo

31 July 2015
Issue: 7663 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Coventry and others v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50, [2015] All ER (D) 234 (Jul)

Following proceedings in which the appellant had been the successful party, the respondents challenged the basis of the costs order in so far as it related to an order for payment of all or part of the success fee payable by the appellants under a conditional fee agreement and the payment of after the event insurance premia. The Supreme Court held that the scheme under the Access to Justice Act 1999 for the recovery of costs was not incompatible with either Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights or Art 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll