header-logo header-logo

04 April 2012 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Property
printer mail-detail

Constructing a case

Martin Burns looks at the impact of removing immunity from property expert witnesses

Last year the Supreme Court made a decision that shook the ground beneath the feet of many people who make a living out of helping courts and tribunals to comprehend complicated, technical, things. I am of course talking about expert witnesses. 
 
The role of expert witnesses

The role of an expert witness is to help a court to understand things that are outside the realm of its knowledge and experience. The testimony of an expert does not bind a court, but simply adds technical detail to the evidential picture and helps a court to reach a fully informed decision. 

Expert witnesses are employed frequently by parties in litigation. They are also instructed to act in arbitration, adjudication and other dispute resolution methods which are routinely used in the property and construction sectors. For many years experts have provided testimony safe in the knowledge that they could not be sued for breach of duty to those who pay their fees.  

Removal of immunity

The
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll