header-logo header-logo

Confusion about pensions & divorce highlighted

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Pensions
printer mail-detail
Many individuals who divorce are losing out due to a lack of understanding of pensions, lawyers have warned.

Last week the Nuffield Foundation’s Pension Advisory Group (PAG) published 'A Guide to the Treatment of Pensions on Divorce' for family lawyers and the public. PAG is composed of judges, lawyers, actuaries, financial planners and academics.

Withers partner James Copson, a co-author of the guide, said: ‘Before pension sharing was introduced in 2000 many women lost out on divorce because they could not share their husband's pension.  

‘In the years since a lack of understanding of the complex issue of how to deal with pensions on divorce has meant that they have lost out once more. What worries me is that, when the waves roll back to uncover the true financial impact of the profession's failings on the subject of pension sharing, there will be a tidal swell of negligence cases against lawyers. 

‘Very few family lawyers really get to grips with the true value of a couple's pensions both at the outset and when negotiating financial awards.’

Meanwhile, the Law Society has called on the government to cut the current £550 court fee for divorce applications.

Giving its written evidence to the bill committee on the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, the society said the fee added an extra financial hurdle to what was already a costly process. Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘The government’s new online divorce system will cut the cost of administration for the courts and this should be reflected in application fees.’

The Bill introduces ‘no fault’ divorce, the option to file a joint divorce petition and a 26-week notice period instead of the current two- or five-year separation period.

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll