header-logo header-logo

15 October 2010
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Confidential information—Injunction against disclosure of information—Interim injunction

British Broadcasting Corporation v HarperCollins Ltd and others [2010] EWHC 2424 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 08 (Oct)

Confidential information—Injunction against disclosure of information—Interim injunction

British Broadcasting Corporation v HarperCollins Ltd and others [2010] EWHC 2424 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 08 (Oct)

Chancery Division, Morgan J, 4 October 2010

In refusing to grant an injunction preventing the actor who played “The Stig” on the well known programme Top Gear from publication of his autobiography and thereby revealing his identity, the court has found that as the information was already in the public domain there was no basis for an injunction based on confidentiality.

Richard Spearman QC and Jonathan Barnes (instructed by Alexis Hawkes, BBC litigation department) for the BBC. Hugh Tomlinson QC and Laura Prince (instructed by Davenport Lyons) for the publishers. Hugh Tomlinson QC and Laura Prince (instructed by Clarke Willmott LLP) for Mr Collins and the service company.

The claimant broadcast a well known and successful television programme called Top Gear. Since 2002, a character called “The Stig” appeared in a racing driver suit and helmet with a dark

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll