header-logo header-logo

10 March 2017
Issue: 7737 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

Re Burnden Group Ltd; Fielding and another v Hunt (acting as Liquidator of the Burnden Group Ltd) [2017] EWHC 406 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 29 (Mar)

The Chancery Division ruled that a liquidator of a company was not personally liable to pay the costs of the applicants’ successful appeal, under r 4.83 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 (SI 1986/1925), against the rejection of their proof of debt in respect of a company. The court held that a finding that a liquidator had been acting for his personal advantage in relation to an appeal against a proof of debt ought to lead to the liquidator being ordered personally liable to pay the costs of unsuccessfully resisting the appeal, but that something more than merely unsuccessfully resisting an appeal was needed for the court to make an order for personal liability. The court found that there was no question of the liquidator having acted for his personal advantage in the present case and that the appropriate order, taking account of the fact that the applicants’ conduct had caused an increase in the overall length and cost of the appeal,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll