header-logo header-logo

Commons committee condemns legal aid reform

04 May 2007
Issue: 7271 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

The government’s plans for legal aid were dealt a serious blow this week after they were savaged by an influential parliamentary committee.

The Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee says it fears that if the proposed reforms to the legal aid system go ahead there is a serious risk for access to justice among the most vulnerable in society.

The move to competitive tendering among firms for legal aid contracts must be properly piloted before it is implemented, the committee says. It also calls on government to scrap the “transitional period” of fixed fees, claiming it could lead to significant cuts in income for many legal aid lawyers and prove to be unsustainable.

The committee attacked the government for penny-pinching in some ways yet failing to focus on areas where cost is actually increasing, namely crown court defence work and public law children cases.

Committee chair, Alan Beith MP, says: “The risks inherent in these largely untested and unpiloted reform plans might be justified were the whole system in utter crisis but large parts of the legal aid system are stable in cost terms.”

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll