header-logo header-logo

16 December 2010 / Daniel Lightman KC
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Features , Costs , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Coming of age?

Daniel Lightman revisits the statutory derivative claim…three years on

The statutory derivative claim recently celebrated its third birthday. It was created by Part 11 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), which came into force on 1 October 2007.

This article first considers the approach which the courts have taken to the statutory derivative claim in its first three years, and then identifies two potentially significant issues as to the ambit of derivative claims which are currently unclear and await resolution by the courts, namely whether the common law derivative claim has been abolished and whether such claims can be brought in respect of a company in liquidation.

The two-stage application for permission

Because he is seeking to bring a claim not on his own behalf but on behalf of and for the benefit of the company of which he is a member, after issuing the claim form the derivative claimant must apply for permission to continue the claim. CA 2006 provides for a two-stage procedure for the court to consider the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll