header-logo header-logo

Closing the tech gap

18 March 2025
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail
Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls has assigned the job of resolving legal uncertainties around digital assets and artificial intelligence (AI) liability to an expert group of judges, lawyers and regulators

Delivering the keynote speech to the 2025 UK Lawtech Conference last week, Sir Geoffrey, who chairs the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce (UKJT), said the taskforce will be starting work ‘immediately’ on its next three projects.

First, it will produce non-binding guidance on the concept of ‘control’ regarding digital assets. Second, it will provide a statement on redress for harms caused by AI—the taskforce has already issued three statements on the status of cryptoassets and smart contracts and the use of blockchain systems.

Sir Geoffrey said the fourth statement will be produced ‘with an eye to whether or not statutory intervention or underpinning is required.

‘The focus will be on harms caused to third parties and whether the existing law of torts can adequately respond’. He said the UKJT thinks there is ‘genuine market uncertainty’ about how and when developers of AI tools and those that use them might incur legal liability when things go wrong. Given the ‘multiple calls in the UK’ for more AI regulation and ‘for legislation to create new liabilities for its use. It would obviously be useful for government to have a reliable legal backdrop against which to consider those calls’.

The third project is to form an International Jurisdiction Taskforce (IJT), bringing together ‘legal thinkers in the digital space from the main private law jurisdictions around the world’. Sir Geoffrey said the idea ‘is to start the process of seeing whether some level of private law alignment can be achieved between the laws applicable in the most commonly chosen commercial jurisdictions. New York law, English law, Singapore law, Dubai law and French and German law might be a suitable starting point’.

Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll