Latest in Jacksonland, flexi tenants and the possibility of advance rent protection
JACKCHAT
And for now
New CPR 44.3(8) loves interim costs when the court orders detailed assessment. In Deutsche Bank v Khan and others [2013] EWHC 1020 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 205 (Apr) before Hamblin J the claimant receiving party asked for £2,743,000 which represented two thirds of what it was claiming discounted by 20%. The judge made an interim order for £2,100,000. Cool. The basis of assessment was ordered to be indemnity, the claimant relying on a facility agreement requiring an indemnity for “all costs”. It was held that this was equivalent to indemnity costs and that the clear weight of authority supported the proposition that such a provision meant the indemnity basis. The only authority to the contrary was Re Adelphi Hotel (Brighton) Ltd [1953] 1 WLR 8955 but Vaisey J there had not been followed in other cases.
Mediation conundrum
Mediation may be viewed as a little less attractive if it fails and the ultimate victor in court with a costs order in his favour is
