header-logo header-logo

29 July 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 31 July 2020

Court bargains on offer; COVID lesson; Online for FR consents

Naughty MoJ

They’ve done it again. Two years ago the MoJ announced it had been overcharging on a series of court fees and would be operating a refund scheme which is still open (see ‘Civil way‘, 168 NLJ 7802, p19). It has now reviewed fees charged for 2018/19 against actual cost and concluded that there has been more overcharging. The good news is that loadsafees are being reduced without the need to wear a mask as from next Monday 3 August 2020—so hold the post—by the Courts Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2020 (SI 2020/720). The bad news is that there will not be another refund scheme, on the shaky grounds that the MoJ has taken prompt action to reduce for the future and that the overcharged fees were set on the basis of a predictive estimate of what the cost would be which is claimed to have been reasonable. The MoJ says it is continuing to make improvements to its data in relation to court costs.

Civil proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll