header-logo header-logo

29 July 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 31 July 2020

Court bargains on offer; COVID lesson; Online for FR consents

Naughty MoJ

They’ve done it again. Two years ago the MoJ announced it had been overcharging on a series of court fees and would be operating a refund scheme which is still open (see ‘Civil way‘, 168 NLJ 7802, p19). It has now reviewed fees charged for 2018/19 against actual cost and concluded that there has been more overcharging. The good news is that loadsafees are being reduced without the need to wear a mask as from next Monday 3 August 2020—so hold the post—by the Courts Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2020 (SI 2020/720). The bad news is that there will not be another refund scheme, on the shaky grounds that the MoJ has taken prompt action to reduce for the future and that the overcharged fees were set on the basis of a predictive estimate of what the cost would be which is claimed to have been reasonable. The MoJ says it is continuing to make improvements to its data in relation to court costs.

Civil proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll