header-logo header-logo

19 July 2018
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 20 July 2018

More court fee overcharges; insolvency PD changed; bundle diet; HMRC assessed.

FEES OVERCHARGE PART 2

And I’ve spent the past three years berating supermarkets for misleading price labels! Over at the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) we saw last time I was with you that it had got it wrong with the fee collected on issue of low value stage 3 protocol claims (See ‘Civil way’, NLJ 6 July 2018 p13). It’s another mea culpa with the Court of Protection, Civil Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Fees (Amendment) Order 2018 (SI 2018/812) which comes into force this coming Monday 23 July 2018 and recognises that certain fees have been levied at over full cost recovery levels. Action is being taken to refund overcharges. Officials are working on detailed arrangements for a refund scheme. Perhaps consideration will be given to a free coffee and a prize draw for those out of pocket, though, more likely, we will see the sacrifice of some staff to finance the scheme and future loss of revenue. The MoJ tells me that it estimates future fee income will be down

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll