header-logo header-logo

19 July 2018
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 20 July 2018

More court fee overcharges; insolvency PD changed; bundle diet; HMRC assessed.

FEES OVERCHARGE PART 2

And I’ve spent the past three years berating supermarkets for misleading price labels! Over at the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) we saw last time I was with you that it had got it wrong with the fee collected on issue of low value stage 3 protocol claims (See ‘Civil way’, NLJ 6 July 2018 p13). It’s another mea culpa with the Court of Protection, Civil Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Fees (Amendment) Order 2018 (SI 2018/812) which comes into force this coming Monday 23 July 2018 and recognises that certain fees have been levied at over full cost recovery levels. Action is being taken to refund overcharges. Officials are working on detailed arrangements for a refund scheme. Perhaps consideration will be given to a free coffee and a prize draw for those out of pocket, though, more likely, we will see the sacrifice of some staff to finance the scheme and future loss of revenue. The MoJ tells me that it estimates future fee income will be down

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll