header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 September 2014 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 26 September 2014

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Harassment in Court & Ouch! 

Harassment in Court

Restraint and vexatious litigant orders have their place but they fail to compensate the hapless litigant in a pecuniary way for the agony of being dragged to more civil court venues than is healthy for the organs. Fox v Hall [2014] EWHC 2747 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 78 (Aug) (in which, incidentally, the claimant came a cropper) reminds that, as a matter of law, it is possible for litigation to constitute harassment. In Allen v Southwark London Borough Council[2008] EWCA Civ 1478, [2008] All ER (D) 113 (Nov) the Court of Appeal held that a number of wrongly issued possession proceedings could amount to harassment. And in Baron v CPS(13 June 2000, unreported) Morrison J said that if civil proceedings were being used for an ulterior purpose, namely to air legitimate grievances but to cause distress to those involved in the process, then the line may be crossed and the acts may become unlawful under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Ouch! Revisited

The Civil Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll