header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 January 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Company , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 23 January 2009

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Litigious back-scratching in Europe
The lack of success fee
Fast track limit up

 

C’est Magnifique
Two new creatures for cross-border claims out of the European womb—the EOP (European Order for Payment) and the ESCP (the European Small Claims Procedure). The e EOP procedure is incorporated in Regulation 1896/2006/ EC of 12 July 2006 and the ESCP in Regulation 861/2007/EC of 11 July 2007. Both procedures have been brought into force in the UK. The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2008 (SI 2008/ 2178) introduced provisions operating alongside the regulations (see CPR and PD 78 and prescribed forms with 47th update). The e EOP procedure kicked off on 12 December 2008 and the ESCP on 1 January 2009. They are both without prejudice to existing cross-border procedures and apply throughout the EC subject to the customary opting out by Denmark thereby avoiding double Dutch pleading. Accommodating jurisdictional changes have been made by the High Court and County Court Jurisdiction (Amendment) Order 2008 (SI 2008/2934) (JAO). (Go to http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home). Longer
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll