header-logo header-logo

Civil questions answered

14 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Solicitors consistently raised three questions on Professor Dominic Regan’s annual civil procedure tour, Regan writes in NLJ this week.

They concerned Part 36 offers, how difficult it is to get relief from sanctions, and how to determine whether costs are appropriate.

Giving answers, Regan, who advised Lord Justice Jackson on civil justice costs reform, advises that ‘the deadly trap within Part 36 is that an offer, once made, stays made. It doesn’t lapse through the passage of time’.

For those facing sanctions, he suggests they ‘remedy the lapse as fast as you can and simultaneously make an application for relief… explain how default occurred. It is compelling to point out, if you can, that the breach was innocent and not disruptive’.

Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll