header-logo header-logo

14 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Civil questions answered

Solicitors consistently raised three questions on Professor Dominic Regan’s annual civil procedure tour, Regan writes in NLJ this week.

They concerned Part 36 offers, how difficult it is to get relief from sanctions, and how to determine whether costs are appropriate.

Giving answers, Regan, who advised Lord Justice Jackson on civil justice costs reform, advises that ‘the deadly trap within Part 36 is that an offer, once made, stays made. It doesn’t lapse through the passage of time’.

For those facing sanctions, he suggests they ‘remedy the lapse as fast as you can and simultaneously make an application for relief… explain how default occurred. It is compelling to point out, if you can, that the breach was innocent and not disruptive’.

Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll