header-logo header-logo

29 November 2013
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Child support second charge

What is the current state of thinking about the efficacy of a second charge...

What is the current state of thinking about the efficacy of a second charge against the former matrimonial home under a financial remedies order where the resident parent is agreeing not to claim child support in return for preserving the property and the non-resident parent wishes to ensure he does not suffer double jeopardy? The charge would be for a sum equivalent to any child support the non-resident parent ends up having to pay.

Any agreement not to claim child maintenance or to repay any sums paid under a maintenance calculation would be unenforceable on public policy grounds. While parties are free to agree whatever financial arrangement they wish, we suggest the court should not give its approval to such an arrangement and that the charge would be set aside on challenge.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll