header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Child care court fee could go

Report’s findings could trigger an end to the controversial fees

A £4,000 court fee for child care proceedings could be scrapped following a report into the tragic case of Baby P.

Lord Laming’s report, published on 12 March, looks at whether the reforms he proposed after the death of Victoria Climbié in 2000 have been implemented. It makes 58 recommendations, including the appointment of an independent person to undertake a review of the impact of court fees, with a view to abolishing them from 2010–11 onwards.

Court fees for care proceedings were controversially raised from about £150 to about £4,000 in May 2008.

Lord Laming says, in his report: “It is of concern that the need to pay a fee might sometimes present a barrier that could influence a local authority’s decision as to whether or not to commence care proceedings... If even in one case a local authority is deterred in taking action, that is one case too many.”

Children’s Secretary Ed Balls MP has said there will be a review of court fees and that if there is evidence the fees are a barrier for local authorities when deciding whether to proceed, the government will abolish them. He has accepted all of Lord Laming’s recommendations.

Commenting on Mr Balls’s statement, Lucy Theis QC, chairman of the Family Law Bar Association, says: “The minister’s response, set out very clearly the huge challenge faced by those dealing with vulnerable families on a daily basis.

“The support and expertise of the Family Bar, which provides specialist representation by dedicated practitioners who often have to deal with incredibly difficult situations involving child protection, is vital if we are to give the public the service they deserve.”

Desmond Browne QC, chairman of the Bar, says: “It was inevitable that an increase from £150 to £4,825 for a fully contested matter would deter some authorities from acting.”

Lord Laming’s report, The Protection of Children in England: A Progress Report, warns there has been an “over-emphasis on process and targets” within social work departments, which has caused already overstretched social workers to lose confidence. It calls for better communication between agencies, on-thejob training for social work students, and for directors with no child protection experience to appoint an experienced social work manager to support them.

Lord Laming adds: “Rather than feeling valued for their commitment and expertise, professionals across these services often feel undervalued, unsupported and at risk.”

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll