header-logo header-logo

22 November 2024 / Yasseen Gailani , Megan Hiluta
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Procedure & practice , Damages
printer mail-detail

Changing tack: beyond damages in M&A disputes

197683
Yasseen Gailani & Megan Hiluta consider the advantages of the little-used remedy of ‘specific performance’
  • Specific performance is a powerful yet rarely awarded remedy in English law M&A disputes.
  • Considering whether you want it available at the time of drafting the share performance agreement can greatly assist in obtaining the remedy should a dispute arise.
  • Acting quickly, and seeking specialist advice, is critical if specific performance is the remedy sought.

When most people think of litigation, and specifically the remedies sought in contractual disputes, the first, and sometimes only, remedy that comes to mind is damages. Yet there are many other remedies that can be sought. In this article we focus on the relatively rare, yet powerful, remedy of specific performance in the context of M&A disputes under English law, although some of the principles may have wider application.

What is specific performance?

Specific performance is an equitable remedy by which a court orders a defaulting party to comply with (or ‘specifically perform’) its remaining positive contractual obligations. The party requesting specific

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll