header-logo header-logo

18 July 2012
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Catholic church vicariously liable

Church legally responsible for child abuse by priests

The Portsmouth Diocese is legally responsible for child abuse committed by one of its priests, the Court of Appeal has held.

In JGE v the Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, the court held by a 2–1 majority that vicarious liability can arise where a relationship is “akin to employment”.

JGE claimed she was sexually abused by a Catholic priest, Father Baldwin, while she was a young child in a home run by the Diocese.

In November, the High Court held the church was responsible for the misconduct of its clergy. The church appealed on the ground it could not be held liable since there was no formal employment relationship.

Dismissing the appeal, Lord Justice Davis said “the relationship between the bishop and Father Baldwin…was sufficiently akin to that of employment”.

Tracey Emmott, partner at Emmott Snell, who represented JGE, says: “The wider implications of this judgment are significant, such that it is now settled that there no longer has to be a formal employment relationship for legal responsibility to attach to one party for the wrongdoings of another.

“It may be enough if there is a sufficient degree of control by one party over the other, that the wrongdoer was carrying out the purposes or aims of the other, and if it is fair, just and reasonable. All these factors were found to be present in the relationship between a bishop and a priest.”

Issue: 7523 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll