header-logo header-logo

14 July 2016 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Campaign overdrive?

nlj_7707_moore

Political & product liability: Sarah Moore highlights what politicians & toothpaste do not have in common

 
  • ​While the consumer is protected against the misleading claims of toothpaste and other product advertisers, the voter remains exposed to the unchecked claims of all political parties.

In what is proving to be a seismic episode for British politics, not to mention the financial markets—the news that the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) has received complaints relating to pre-referendum political advertising may well have escaped the attention of the general public.

According to a report in The Guardian on 28 June 2016 (“Ad watchdog powerless to act on controversial Brexit campaigns”), ASA has received almost 400 complaints about what petitioners have called misleading, inaccurate and discriminatory ads intended to influence voters ahead of the referendum.

Complaints concerned a range of materials, including high profile Vote Leave advertisements stating: “Let’s give our NHS the £350m the EU takes every week.” This message was also emblazoned on the side of the campaign’s battle bus: “We send the EU £350 million a week—let’s fund our NHS instead.” In recent weeks the veracity of these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll