header-logo header-logo

14 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Cameras in court

MPs have approved government proposals, made under the Crime and Courts Act 2013, to allow live television broadcasting in the Court of Appeal.
 

The proposals will now be debated by the House of Lords before taking effect next month. Cameras will be allowed into both the civil and criminal appeal court for the legal arguments and the final judgment. The government then intends to extend this to allow the broadcast of sentencing remarks in the Crown courts.

Filming of victims, witnesses, defendants and jurors will not be allowed.

Courts Minister Helen Grant said: “We are opening up the court process to allow people to see and hear the judges’ decisions in their own words.”

Proceedings in the Supreme Court are already streamed live on the internet.

Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
"There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
back-to-top-scroll