header-logo header-logo

14 January 2016
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Briggs Review backs online court

Litigants bringing claims up to £25,000 could access court without lawyers

The Briggs Review has recommended setting up an online court for claims up to £25,000, which litigants could access without lawyers.

In his interim report of the Civil Courts Structure Review, published this week, Lord Justice Briggs identifies “a clear and pressing need” for an online court, which would give litigants effective access to justice “without having to incur the disproportionate cost of using lawyers.

The online court would process cases in three stages: first, a largely automated, interactive process to identify the issues and provide documentary evidence; second, conciliation and case management by case officers; and third, resolution by judges. On screen, telephone, face-to-face and video meetings would be held to discuss each case.

The case officers would take over some of the judge’s more routine tasks, but parties would have a right to have these decisions reconsidered by a judge.

Briggs LJ is consulting on the basic details of the process. Practitioners are asked for their views on whether the online court should be a branch of the county court governed by the Civil Procedure Rules or entirely separate, what types of claims should be included, the appeal process, and whether the losing side should pay the other side’s costs.

Written responses must be submitted before the end of February.

As for the existing civil courts, Briggs LJ says it is a priority to put in place the structure and software for all the re-organised courts as soon as possible, provide extra training and staff for judges, and ease the burden on the Court of Appeal.

He wants a stronger concentration of civil expertise among the circuit judges and district judges, and for all civil work with a regional connection to be tried in the regions, regardless of value.

Welcoming the interim report, Lord Thomas, the Lord Chief Justice, said: “The time is ripe for reform, and it is in any event essential and unavoidable.”

Briggs LJ began his review of civil court structures and judicial processes last July, will publish a fuller consultation by the end of May, and will complete his review by the end of July 2016.

Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll