header-logo header-logo

20 February 2019
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit impact on sanctions

‘Significant divergence’ on the horizon

The impact of Brexit on UK sanctions laws could be ‘far-reaching’ and lead to more red tape for businesses in the future, a leading trade lawyer has warned.

Hogan Lovells partner Aline Doussin, who heads the firm’s UK trade team, said this week that the UK government, post-Brexit, will be able to adopt sanctions ‘separately and independently’ from what the EU does.

‘Going forward, one cannot exclude a significant divergence in the future of UK sanctions from what the EU will do on its own,’ she said in an article posted on Hogan Lovells’ website.

‘This could lead to additional compliance burdens for businesses and financial institutions, which will have to deal with multiple and increasingly complex sanctions regimes.’

In the past few weeks, secondary legislation has been put before Parliament to replace references in sanctions laws to member states and the EU with references to the UK, and to replace references to the competent authorities with references to the UK Treasury. This means existing aspects of the financial sanctions regimes against countries such as Afghanistan, Burma, Iran and Venezuela will continue.

Consequently, Doussin said, ‘we do not expect any gaps in implementing existing sanctions regimes’. Post-Brexit, the UK will be required by international law to implement UN sanctions in UK domestic law and will carry over all EU sanctions at the time of departure.

After that, however, the UK will ‘have the powers to adopt other sanctions under the Sanctions Act, separately and independently from what the EU does,’ Doussin said.

‘In this, the impact of Brexit on UK sanctions laws is far-reaching.’

Prime Minister Theresa May flew to Brussels this week for further talks with the European Commission and heads of EU member states, hoping to secure concessions over the backstop. However, EU leaders continue to emphasise that they will not renegotiate the withdrawal agreement.

Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll