header-logo header-logo

Brexit behind the headlines

08 September 2017
Issue: 7760 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail
nlj_7760_greene_0

Position papers restate mantra that CJEU will have no direct jurisdiction post Brexit

The government’s latest position papers on Brexit hint at retaining the status quo, according to Brexit commentator David Greene.

Press headlines suggested a ‘climbdown’ on the government’s position that the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (CJEU) would end upon Brexit, following the publication in August of the UK’s position papers: ‘Providing a cross-border civil judicial co-operation framework’ and ‘Enforcement and dispute resolution’.

Writing this week, however, Greene, NLJ consultant editor, says: ‘Have they forced a government climbdown? Not quite: both papers restate the mantra that upon withdrawal the CJEU will no longer have direct jurisdiction in the UK.

‘That keeps the politicians happy, but, subject to that point, both papers smack of retaining, as far as possible, the status quo in the longer term.’

Greene says Brexit will have an impact at three main levels—government level, investor level and at the level of day to day business and citizens’ rights.

At government level, the UK position has been that the CJEU will have no continuing role although its pre-Brexit rulings will have binding effect. The EU’s position is that the CJEU must have a continuing role in the process as a result of the EU Treaties. However, ‘the new UK paper now talks of the possibility of voluntary references to the CJEU for interpretation only,’ says Greene. ‘It rejects the idea that the CJEU should be entitled to impose any remedies.’

On the rights of investors, whether small businesses or multinationals, Greene says ‘the likelihood is that they will be the subject of an ICSD arbitration process.

‘These arbitration processes remain highly contentious and bearing in mind the level of trade would need to be very well resourced, the UK does not foresee any role for the CJEU in that area. The EU position is unclear but the role of the CJEU gives rise to complexities in this area under the EU Treaties.’

On citizens’ cross-border rights, the EU and UK are at odds. The EU sees the CJEU having a role in determination of those on a permanent basis, says Greene. 

Issue: 7760 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll