header-logo header-logo

11 June 2009 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Book reviews: The Justice Gap: whatever happened to legal aid?

Back Page Reviews

 

 

 

The Justice Gap: whatever happened to legal aid?

Steve Hynes and Jon Robins, pp171

Legal Action Group, £20, ISBN: 9781903307632

 
This is just the kind of book that the Legal Action Group (LAG) ought to publish. It is clearly written; provides a good account of the history of legal aid; analyses its current problems; searches for solutions. Legal aid practitioners will probably say that they are too busy surviving on meagre levels of pay to read it. But, if their remuneration is not to be reduced yet further, those who defend access to justice have to find a language and a set of ideas which will get legal aid the priority that it deserves.

Understandably, the book spends most of its time discussing events under the Labour government since 1997. Critical in general though they are, the authors are occasionally over-generous. The Community Legal Service (CLS) was a slogan dreamt up on the back of a fag packet by Paul Boateng MP in 1995. In truth, it never justified the LAG authors'

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll