header-logo header-logo

23 September 2022 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Book review: Banks on Sentence 2022

"In many respects, this publication deserves a tremendous amount of credit for being right at the start, and perhaps the impetus for, the present wealth of quality texts dedicated to ‘sentencing’ as a standalone discipline."
  • Author: Harry O’Sullivan
  • Publisher: LexisNexis Butterworths
  • ISBN: 9781474323017
  • RRP: £159.99


Banks on Sentence is now in its 17th edition and in many respects, this publication deserves a tremendous amount of credit for being right at the start, and perhaps the impetus for, the present wealth of quality texts dedicated to ‘sentencing’ as a standalone discipline.

Over the last two decades, the sentencing exercise in criminal courts has, for better or worse, become a technical and somewhat formulaic application. Gone now are the days when experienced criminal judges can use common sense and experience to pass individual sentences which not only fit the crime, but fit the perpetrator of that crime.

The Sentencing Guidelines Council, as it was once called, began the infiltration of the judge’s role and very soon, ‘guidelines’ became mathematical formulas, which require analysis and application, with the occasional input of case law to remind us that the sentencing process remains in the legal rather than mathematical department.

Sentencing is all about consistency and predictability. It is to be made user friendly, capable of broadcast on television and rigorous enough to survive a ‘red top’ battering.

Enter Banks and all the sons and daughters of Banks.

Divided into two soft back volumes (for those of us who take our law from things we can touch, feel and smell), the first volume tackles the fundamental tools of sentencing from Bind Overs to Serious Terrorism Sentencing, introduced in 2021, the latter providing a most accessible resume of the regime and its application to different age groups.

Banks grapples with the latest developments of sentencing in the context of terrorism related offences with the confidence of a publication which others have since followed. The recognition that sentencing in this modern and dangerous world not only means quantification of time ‘inside’ but also addressing future arrangements for release and monitoring, is expertly nuanced in this latest work. Volume 2 is, as the author informs us, substantially rewritten to take in these important changes, which of course makes the text right up to date.

The easily referenced volumes make for swift and accurate access to the materials, and the criminal offence by criminal offence structure adds to a logical approach to this wide ranging subject. As always, the close proximity of the case law to the starting points, aggravating and mitigating factors, make a full assimilation of all the tools at the advocates disposal both clear and condensed.

As was eloquently put by the Chair of the Commission into the Experience of Victims and Long-Term Prisoners in the preface to that report: ‘It is not just the length of the sentence but the content of the sentence that fulfils the requirements of the judge’s direction for retribution, reduction of crime, deterrence, public protection, reparation and rehabilitation’. Banks goes a long way to helping the courts achieve this difficult but vital balance.

Or as one of my clients once put it when I met him in prison to discuss tariffs: ‘What does Banks say, Mr Cooper?’

Reviewer: Professor John Cooper KC, 25 Bedford Row (www.25bedfordrow.com).

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll