header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

A bitter pill

moore

Are “Big Pharma” & voluntary codes ending the Dark Age of industry bias, asks Sarah Moore

On 1 January this year a spotlight was shone on the hitherto shady world of drug company payments to doctors in the UK.

From this date 98% of drug companies—all those represented by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) are required to record any payments they make to doctors with a view to this data being uploaded onto a publicly searchable database from July 2016.

This innovation is the result of a new code adopted by the ABPI, which requires that if a healthcare professional agrees to do paid work for a company, they should sign a contract granting permission for the payment data to be shared publicly.

This data will be stored on a central platform on the ABPI website and will be available for at least two years. According to the ABPI, after the database launches in July 2016 anyone will be able to search for payment data and then download the entire dataset, probably for free, although further details are yet to be confirmed.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll