header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

A bitter pill

moore

Are “Big Pharma” & voluntary codes ending the Dark Age of industry bias, asks Sarah Moore

On 1 January this year a spotlight was shone on the hitherto shady world of drug company payments to doctors in the UK.

From this date 98% of drug companies—all those represented by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) are required to record any payments they make to doctors with a view to this data being uploaded onto a publicly searchable database from July 2016.

This innovation is the result of a new code adopted by the ABPI, which requires that if a healthcare professional agrees to do paid work for a company, they should sign a contract granting permission for the payment data to be shared publicly.

This data will be stored on a central platform on the ABPI website and will be available for at least two years. According to the ABPI, after the database launches in July 2016 anyone will be able to search for payment data and then download the entire dataset, probably for free, although further details are yet to be confirmed.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll