header-logo header-logo

A bitter pill?

28 February 2014 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

What impact will the new European Medical Device Regulations have on UK medicine, asks Sarah Moore

At the end of last year, after a year of fierce lobbying by patient groups and manufacturers alike, the new European Medical Device Regulations were finally submitted to the European Parliament and Council for debate and member state approval. When implemented, these new regulations will change legislation that has remained largely untouched for over 20 years.

Ongoing, high profile, prosthetic hip and breast implant litigation has played a key role in galvanising this change. However, exactly what impact these proposed regulatory changes will have, both for patient safety and product litigation in the UK remains to be seen.

EUCOMED, the organisation which speaks for European medical device manufacturers, has warned that the new regulations will stifle innovation and slow down the release of novel products into the market. For product liability lawyers, and others dealing with the after-effects of “novel” products, such as the ASR hip prosthesis, this change in pace has the potential at least to better protect product users across Europe. However, the extent to which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll