header-logo header-logo

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Biological fathers seek contact

Groundbreaking case for men who father children with lesbian couples

Men who father children with a lesbian couple in a civil partnership can apply for contact rights, the High Court has held.

Since 2008, the biological father has had no legal status where the biological mother is in a civil partnership at the time of conception. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 put civil partners on an equal footing with married couples, giving the civil partner automatic parental rights.

In the first case of its kind last week, however, Mr Justice Baker dismissed arguments that a biological father should be refused permission to apply for an order for contact.

The case, Re G and Re Z [2013] EWHC 134 (Fam), involved a gay couple in a civil partnership and two lesbian couples in civil partnerships. They were all good friends and agreed to have children together. One of the men was the biological father of two children belonging to one lesbian couple, while his partner was the biological father of the child of the other lesbian couple.

The men claimed they had regular contact with the children until their friendship with the mothers broke down, although the extent of this contact was disputed. No formal or written agreement was ever made.

Delivering his judgment, Baker J said the fact the mothers in both cases chose friends to be known fathers was a relevant factor.

Mark Harper, partner at Withers, who acted pro bono for the father in Re G, said: “These cases recognise the importance of the biological link children have with their fathers.

“Despite fathers in these situations not being recognised as parents as a matter of law, if the facts justify it, they can apply to the court for their children to have contact with them. Any men or lesbian couples in these situations need a clear understanding of the complexity of the law and should enter into agreements before starting out on having a child.

“The judgment confirms that if a lesbian couple do not want their children to have a relationship with the father then it is best to seek IVF from a licensed clinic to have anonymous sperm donation, rather than a known father.”

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll