header-logo header-logo

09 March 2022
Issue: 7970 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Be more ambitious, ministers told

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has questioned the government’s ‘meagre ambition’ of cutting to 53,000 the number of outstanding Crown Court cases

The influential MPs’ committee said reducing the backlog, which has nearly doubled since March 2019, to 59,928―by ‘less than 8,000 by March 2025’―is ‘unlikely to address unacceptable delays to justice for victims, witnesses, and defendants’.

It identified ‘significant, systemic challenges’ to clearing the backlog, including a shortfall in numbers of trained judges, legal professionals and local staff to support criminal courts. It also ‘remains unconvinced that the prison system will cope with the likely increase in prisoners’, given plans to recruit 20,000 more police officers.

PAC chair Dame Meg Hillier said: ‘The Ministry of Justice says it will take two years to cut this backlog by less than a sixth.

‘It’s just not good enough. The number of people waiting more than a year to have a serious criminal case heard has more than trebled since March 2020 from already unacceptably high levels.’

The pandemic exacerbated the backlog in the Crown Court, which peaked at 61,000 in June 2021. 

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Years of underinvestment and cuts mean there is a real risk that the capacity is simply not there in terms of solicitors and barristers, as well as judges, to do the large volume of work necessary to clear the backlog in a meaningful fashion.

‘Investment is needed now across the entire criminal justice system, starting with the immediate implementation of the 15% increase in criminal legal aid rates recommended in Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid. Ensuring that any barriers preventing diverse candidates from getting opportunities in the profession are tackled, as well as recruiting from diverse talent pools of fee-paid and salaried judges in courts and tribunals, will help to build the capacity needed to clear the backlog.’

Professor Chris Bones, chair of CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) said increasing ‘the pipeline of CILEX judges to all judicial appointments, not just the lower tribunals’ would make ‘an immediate difference’.

Issue: 7970 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll