header-logo header-logo

09 March 2022
Issue: 7970 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Be more ambitious, ministers told

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has questioned the government’s ‘meagre ambition’ of cutting to 53,000 the number of outstanding Crown Court cases

The influential MPs’ committee said reducing the backlog, which has nearly doubled since March 2019, to 59,928―by ‘less than 8,000 by March 2025’―is ‘unlikely to address unacceptable delays to justice for victims, witnesses, and defendants’.

It identified ‘significant, systemic challenges’ to clearing the backlog, including a shortfall in numbers of trained judges, legal professionals and local staff to support criminal courts. It also ‘remains unconvinced that the prison system will cope with the likely increase in prisoners’, given plans to recruit 20,000 more police officers.

PAC chair Dame Meg Hillier said: ‘The Ministry of Justice says it will take two years to cut this backlog by less than a sixth.

‘It’s just not good enough. The number of people waiting more than a year to have a serious criminal case heard has more than trebled since March 2020 from already unacceptably high levels.’

The pandemic exacerbated the backlog in the Crown Court, which peaked at 61,000 in June 2021. 

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Years of underinvestment and cuts mean there is a real risk that the capacity is simply not there in terms of solicitors and barristers, as well as judges, to do the large volume of work necessary to clear the backlog in a meaningful fashion.

‘Investment is needed now across the entire criminal justice system, starting with the immediate implementation of the 15% increase in criminal legal aid rates recommended in Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid. Ensuring that any barriers preventing diverse candidates from getting opportunities in the profession are tackled, as well as recruiting from diverse talent pools of fee-paid and salaried judges in courts and tribunals, will help to build the capacity needed to clear the backlog.’

Professor Chris Bones, chair of CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) said increasing ‘the pipeline of CILEX judges to all judicial appointments, not just the lower tribunals’ would make ‘an immediate difference’.

Issue: 7970 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll