header-logo header-logo

Bars & the ballot box

17 June 2011 / Craig Barlow , Jason Hadden
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Craig Barlow & Jason Hadden question the government’s blanket ban on prisoner voting

It is a delicious irony that those most affected by the criminal laws of the UK are effectively refused the opportunity through the ballot box to change those laws. That, of course, was Emily Pankhurst’s problem.

Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 provides that: “A convicted person during the time that he is detained in a penal institution in pursuance of his sentence…is legally incapable of voting at any parliamentary or local government election.”

In relation to elections to the European Parliament, s 8 of the European Parliamentary Elections Act 2002 adopts the same stance. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has consistently held since 2004 that this statutory blanket ban thereby created is unlawful.

In Greens and MT v UK the ECtHR recently repeated its position. On 10 February 2011 the House of Commons picked a fight with the ECtHR.

MPs voted by 234 to 22 to defy the EHtCR decision in Greens and continue the UK’s blanket ban against serving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll