header-logo header-logo

Bar Handbook U-turn on diversity duty

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Diversity , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has abandoned its proposal to introduce a duty ‘to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion’ (EDI)

The BSB mooted the amendment to core duty 8 in the Bar Handbook last September, in its consultation on the proposed amendments to the equality rules. However, the Bar Council opposed the change.

Dropping the proposal this week, the BSB said it now intends to work with the profession and will ‘set clear expectations for the progress that we want to see over the next five years’.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘We had significant concerns that a positive duty, as proposed by the BSB, would have taken us backwards.

‘We explained that a change to core duty 8 would lack the clarity needed for barristers to be able to comply. The proposals were not only impractical to implement, but they would also have been open to costly legal challenge that would hinder progress on EDI initiatives.

'We therefore welcome the BSB’s reflection on our concerns and the decision not to change but to maintain the current core duty—a clear and definitive duty not to discriminate.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll