header-logo header-logo

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Diversity , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Bar Handbook U-turn on diversity duty

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has abandoned its proposal to introduce a duty ‘to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion’ (EDI)

The BSB mooted the amendment to core duty 8 in the Bar Handbook last September, in its consultation on the proposed amendments to the equality rules. However, the Bar Council opposed the change.

Dropping the proposal this week, the BSB said it now intends to work with the profession and will ‘set clear expectations for the progress that we want to see over the next five years’.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘We had significant concerns that a positive duty, as proposed by the BSB, would have taken us backwards.

‘We explained that a change to core duty 8 would lack the clarity needed for barristers to be able to comply. The proposals were not only impractical to implement, but they would also have been open to costly legal challenge that would hinder progress on EDI initiatives.

'We therefore welcome the BSB’s reflection on our concerns and the decision not to change but to maintain the current core duty—a clear and definitive duty not to discriminate.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll