header-logo header-logo

28 March 2017
Issue: 7740 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bar Council criticises proposals to extend court sittings

The Bar Council has criticised government proposals for courts to start earlier and finish later. It said this would disadvantage barristers who have childcare responsibilities, especially women, due to the Cab-Rank rule.

The Ministry of Justice announced this week that it will pilot extra sittings at civil, Crown and magistrates’ courts to increase the number of cases they see each day, with the Crown court sitting until 6pm, civil courts until 7pm and magistrates’ courts until 8.30pm.

The Bar Council pointed out that, under the Cab-Rank rule, barristers must accept any appropriate instructions, but will not know until a case is listed whether it will be an early start or a late finish, and cannot withdraw from a case on the grounds that it clashes with childcare arrangements.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “These arrangements will make it almost impossible for parents with childcare responsibilities to predict if they can make the school run or to know when they will be able to pick children up from the child-minders.  

“Childcare responsibilities still fall disproportionately to women, many of whom do not return to the profession after having children. It is hard to see how these plans sit with the government’s commitment to improving diversity in the profession and the judiciary.”

 

Issue: 7740 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll