header-logo header-logo

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bar Council calls for pay parity

Bar Council calls on DPP to address pay ‘iniquity’

Self-employed barristers prosecuting cases deserve parity with lawyers employed by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the Bar Council has said.

Earlier this month, the civil service trade union, the FDA, negotiated a 10% pay rise for CPS Crown Prosecutors; increases of up to 8% for prosecutors, professionals and senior managers; and a 13.5% increase in overtime rates. The rises will be paid over the course of two years.

FDA national officer Steven Littlewood said the pay rise was a ‘well overdue reward for long-serving staff, who have been trapped in the lower ends of pay ranges for years’.

Richard Atkins QC, chair of the Bar Council, said he was pleased for CPS lawyers.

‘This, however, is in stark contrast to the failure to increase the levels of pay for the self-employed members of the Bar who provide an essential public service prosecuting the vast majority of the serious cases tried in the Crown Court,’ he said.

‘The pay scheme under which self-employed barristers are remunerated has had no increases since its inception in 2001 (and has therefore been eroded by inflation) and actually suffered a 5% cut in 2012. There can be no justification for one part of the system to receive a pay increase whilst another part is ignored.

‘The Bar Council looks to the Director of Public Prosecutions to address this iniquity as a matter of urgency.’

Meanwhile, Criminal Bar chair Chris Henley QC, in his Monday Message, described fees for prosecuting as ‘appalling, bordering on the financially immoral, and in many instances pound for pound lower than they were 20 years ago’.

Henley said he received a message from a head of chambers last week that two barristers had just resigned—a senior and a middle ranking junior. Both had left the Bar ‘because the cuts have made the future entirely unsustainable’.

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll