header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011 / Malcolm Dowden , Jen Hawkins
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Features , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Bad publicity?

Jen Hawkins & Malcolm Dowden advise when consent is required for a roadside advertisement

Marketing firms and websites are inviting passing motorists to “buy” roadside advertising space, often on trailers, in fields alongside major roads while farmers and landowners are being offered significant sums of money to install hoardings on their land. Confusion over the law has led some landowners to believe that they do not need consent from the local planning authority (LPA) to display the advertisements. However, if the government takes onboard recent campaigns and decides to act to stamp out unconsented motorway advertising, misconceived landowners out to make a fast buck could find themselves guilty of an offence.

LPA powers

It is clear that the primary responsibility for tackling the problems lies with LPAs. But tight resources and budget cuts may restrict the potential of LPAs to exercise their powers to take enforcement action. Clear guidance, stronger government policy, and further legislative empowerment are needed to support LPAs in carrying out their enforcement role.

In England, outdoor advertisements are controlled by Town and Country (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 2007

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll