header-logo header-logo

12 August 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

The Jackson reforms: winners & losers

Dominic Regan sifts through the Jackson winners & losers

“Inevitably, there will be winners and losers as a result of my proposals” declared Lord Justice Jackson on that bitter January morning last year when he introduced his radical proposals for reform. Intriguingly, some perceived “winners” are looking like losers. Who and why so?

Clause 43

Before we delve into this there is one out and out loser and that is the after the event (ATE) insurance market. Clause 43 of the Legal Aid Bill precludes the recovery of such premiums (except where cover is taken out in clinical negligence cases in respect of expert fees).

The planned extension of the existing portal claims scheme will remove vast tranches of work from the land of risk. The present road traffic accident portal is risk free in the opening stages. Only a tiny minority of cases enter stage 3 where there is the possibility of an adverse costs outcome.

One-way costs shifting will mean that a claimant who loses will not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll