header-logo header-logo

11 November 2010
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Arbitration—Award—Appeal

Guangzhou Dockyards Company Ltd v E N E Aegiali I [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) (Nov)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Blair J, 5 Nov 2010
It is established law that s 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) provides only for an appeal to the court on a question of law, and the parties cannot by agreement create jurisdiction for an appeal against factual findings under it.
Robert Bright QC and Charles Holroyd (instructed by Reed Smith)
for the dockyard. Bernard Eder QC and Sean O’Sullivan (instructed by Ince & Co) for the owners.

The proceedings concerned a contract between Greek shipowners and a Chinese dockyard for the conversion of the former’s vessel. The contract was governed by English law and provided for London arbitration subject to London Maritime Arbitrators’ Association rules and AA 1996. The clause provided that the parties could appeal to the High Court “on any issue arising out of any award.” In the event, the work could not be performed and a dispute arose as to the cause. The tribunal ruled in favour of the owners. The dockyard then brought claims in the Commercial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll