header-logo header-logo

08 November 2021
Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Profession
printer mail-detail

Approval given to practice fee rise for firms that generate the most LeO complaints

Conveyancing firms that generate the most complaints will pay the highest practice fees, under radical Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) plans
The Legal Services Board has approved the CLC changes, which will see 30% of the £686,511 the CLC will pay in 2021/22 for the Legal Services Ombudsman’s (LeO’s) services levied on 83 firms on the basis of usage.

Previously, CLC-regulated firms paid the LeO levy through their practice fees, which are calculated according to turnover. Under the CLC’s changes―the first of their kind in the legal sector―the LeO levy will be separated from the practice fee, reducing the practice fee by an average of 23%.

More than 60% of CLC practices do not generate any referrals to LeO.

For the first year, all firms will share 70% of the LeO costs while the remaining 30% will be allocated according to average number of complaints generated in the past three years.

This means 51 practices (23%) will pay more. Of these, two practices will pay an extra £16,000 and £12,000 respectively, 16 firms will pay between £5,168 and £1,044 more, and 33 practices will pay between £821 and £25 more.

The changes will be phased in over four years, starting at 30% of LeO costs being divided according to usage and rising to 80% of LeO costs.

CLC chief executive Sheila Kumar said: ‘Despite the CLC reducing its own operating costs in a sustainable and steady way over the past five years, the LeO’s costs – which are beyond our control – have grown, and continue to grow, very substantially.

‘Introducing a usage fee is fairer, builds in better proportionality into meeting LeO costs and will encourage improvements in complaints handling. We will monitor the impact of the new approach on complaints handling.’

Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll